Amount of debts due and payable by the testator, payable by the law on succession. (1) waive the fees charged on applications submitted to a collector to reimburse the amount paid to the provincial government1 for stamps that have become damaged, rendered unusable or whose use is no longer necessary, as well as applications for renewal of stamps that have become damaged or unusable; Mr. Vahanvati argued that the concept of «property disputes» in the notification of 1 October 1994 could not be used for economic, commercial and commercial disputes and that the ejusdem-generis clause should be read in its entirety. As the Minister stated in his affidavit, the Crown did not intend to grant benefits to property claims of any kind. He argued that the notice of variation had become necessary «to prevent persons from taking unfair advantage of the concession» and relied on the very wording used by the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Paliwal Electrical (P) Ltd., reported at paragraph 10 of (1996) 3 SCC 407. He also referred me to a judgment of the Constitutional Chamber in the case of D.N. Banerji v. P.R. Mukherjee, published in AIR 1953 SC 58 and, in particular, paragraph 12 of that judgment, in order to emphasise that the structure and context of the provision must also be examined and not just the terms used. The relevant summons reads as follows: (a) In a particular enforcement action, a judge held that court fees would not be payable if the application were made by a party to the proceedings.

This judgment was delivered on 19 September 1995. (D) Bombay Court Fees Act (1959), p. 46 – Initial Rules of the High Court of Bombay – Exemption from court fees – Complainants – Normally, all parties bringing an action in their personal capacity are free when actions are pending before the prothonotary. (para. 19) Thus, the Court of Appeal held that the notice was not applicable to the dispute brought by the bank before the Court against the principal debtor company and its directors. The Court of First Instance therefore held that the complainant was not entitled to an exemption from court fees after notification. an action withdrawn at any time on or after November 1, 1976 with the permission of the court to bring a new action, and if a new action is brought for the subject matter of such an action and the necessary legal costs are paid.] «The eminent Deputy Prime Minister rightly acknowledges that, in view of the above-mentioned legal situation, the applicant is not required to pay Advalorem court fees in the context of application for interim relief No. 2486 of 1997.» 14.

Mr Nair, counsel by training for one of the litigants, drew my attention to the facts of his case, in which an employee had granted a loan on all of her income and was obliged to bring an action for interim relief to recover that amount, since that amount had not been repaid. Similarly, Ms Nazareth`s observations submitted on behalf of other parties to the proceedings who brought actions for interim measures and seek exemption under the concept of `property` as raised in the earlier application, without being influenced by the amending notification. (d) to obtain expert advice or advice, or to be discharged from a trust, or for the appointment of new trustees in accordance with sections 34, 72, 73 or 74 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882. (d) In a road accident case, a distinguished judge, relying on the provisions of Section 257 (3) of the Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, held that: that the property includes both immovable property and movable persons exempted from payment of court fees by order of 24 October 1997. (b) identify the legal costs that should have been paid with another stamp; and (b) if the said amount or value exceeds Rs 50,000, transfer all such charges in respect of the first rupee. 50,000; (29) waive fees to be levied under the Second Schedule for agreements required by Rules 37, 43 and 52 of the Land Revenue Rules 1971; (33) transfer fees collected under points (b) and (c) of Article I of Annex II in response to requests to a tax collector or other tax officer, or to a revenue manager or executive authority, for authorisation to cut down and remove jungle wood as fuel or thorns for fencing property; which are not sold and unoccupied within the meaning of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879; Twenty-five rupees in addition to the fees levied on the application referred to in Article 1(a), (b) or (e). (e) Bombay Court Fees Act (1959), p. 46 R/W p.5 (2) – Initial Rules of the Bombay High Court – Exemption from court fees – Complainants – Prothonotary`s decision that women are the subject of a dispute – The decision may be appealed in cassation to the courts. U/S.5(2).

(para. 19) 5. Action, motion or motion (including the appeal brief) to set aside the appeal to set aside the sale in which the plaintiff, plaintiff or appellant was involved, either directly or through a legal guardian who is not de facto or ad hoc the director, partner or court of Guardina. 13. Mr Grover, counsel for one of the parties to the proceedings, argued that the references to clause B.5.B could not be read solely in the context of clause B.4, as suggested by the defendant. Article B.4 is only one facet of the policy. To say that only matrimonial property disputes would be covered would be to deny benefits to unmarried disputes and property disputes.